Comparison
LotusBook365 - Original vs rusich_army
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @lotus365bookid | @rusich_army |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 101,207 | 11,136 |
| Avg views | 8,122 | 83,400 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 748.9% |
| 30-day growth | — | -5.4% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | — | bots |
| Channel age | 408 days | 20 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@lotus365bookid
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@rusich_army
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.